[wordup] Liberty for Safety Department

[Adam Shand]

Via: The Eristocracy <Eristocracy at merrymeet.com>

From: http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170072.html

Newspaper: Echelon Gave Authorities Warning Of Attacks

By Ned Stafford, Newsbytes
FRANKFURT, GERMANY,
13 Sep 2001, 1:16 PM CST

U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals at least
three months ago that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack
commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of
American and Israeli culture, according to a story in Germany's daily
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ).

The FAZ, quoting unnamed German intelligence sources, said that the
Echelon spy network was being used to collect information about the
terrorist threats, and that U.K. intelligence services apparently also had
advance warning. The FAZ, one of Germany's most respected dailies, said
that even as far back as six months ago western and near-east press
services were receiving information that such attacks were being planned.

Within the American intelligence community, the warnings were taken
seriously and surveillance intensified, the FAZ said. However, there was
disagreement on how such terrorist attacks could be prevented, the
newspaper said.

...

From: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/21680.html

This is how we know Echelon exists
By Kieren McCarthy
Posted: 14/09/2001 at 12:50 GMT

The European Parliament published its report into the Echelon spying
system last week in which it concluded it did exist, was against the law
and that the UK had a lot of explaining to do.

We've sifted through about 100 of the 194 pages and decided that since no
one had yet to officially admit its existence, you may be interested in
how the European Parliament decided it was definitely out there.

The report admits from the outset that the existence of Echelon can only
be proved by gathering together as many clues as possible so that it
remains the only possible explanation. Since we are talking about an
extremely secretive spying mechanism run by some of the most secretive
(and powerful) organisations in the world, this is the only method at our
disposal.

The report used three basic routes to gathering the clues together. One,
physical evidence - all the listening stations dotted about the globe.
Two, unclassified documents and other bits of information from the
military, NSA and other bodies that run the system. And lastly, the
testimony of investigative journalists who have concentrated on Echelon -
including Duncan Campbell and Nicky Hager - and former employees of the
security services.

Where's The Evidence? Physical evidence consists of a study of twenty
listening stations around the world - five in the US, three in Australia,
two in the UK, then others in New Zealand, Germany, Puerto Rico, Japan,
Hong Kong, Cyprus, Guam.

The question is: how do we know that the stations are listening stations
and not kosher satellite bases? A bit of a giveaway is that they are all
run by the military and you are not entitled to visit them - which you
would be if they were normal dishes. That operatives and staff from
different countries are also stationed at each station is a little
peculiar too. Another clue is that many have normal satellite bases
located very close to them - why would you need two stations for one
satellite?

Then there are the different types of antenna in use. Various types of
antenna, each with a distinctive shape, are used to pick up different
sorts of signals. If you want to receive satellite signals you need a huge
parabolic antenna - and these are the huge golf-ball like domes you see in
pictures. The spherical covers not only protect the antenna but also hide
which direction it is pointing in. That doesn't prove what sort of signals
are being picked up though.

Nevertheless, if a station has two or more satellites with diameters
greater than 18 metres, they are intercepting civilian communications.
Which - tied in with the other information above starts making the case
for a spy network.

One of the most important aspects to the whole Echelon issue is that it
consists of an agreement between the US, UK, New Zealand, Australia and
Canada to work together and share information. Without this agreement, it
would be impossible for a global spying network to be built since no one
country has territories all over the world. (This is also the reason why
only the French and Russians could possibly be running effective spying
networks as well.)

Secret Love

By finding evidence of unusually close ties between the security services
in these different countries, the idea of Echelon is further supported.
This comes in the form of the UKUSA agreement.

There is surprisingly little official evidence of the agreement's
existence but there is enough to conclude it exists. The UKUSA agreement
is an extension of the information-sharing agreement signed by the UK and
the USA during the Second World War. Australia and New Zealand were also
tied into this later thanks to the continuing war with Japan.

The report quotes several official documents that make reference not only
to a UKUSA agreement but also Echelon. For example: the 1999/2000 annual
report of the UK Intelligence and Security Committee - a parliamentary
watchdog - explicitly states: "The quality of intelligence gathered
clearly reflects the value of close co-operation under the UKUSA
agreement." It then refers to when the NSA's equipment failed in that
year, it ran it operations through the UK equivalent, GCHQ.

By piecing together this and other mentions in seven other official
reports, a clear picture is built up. Then there are declassified US
documents (in the UK we still maintain archaic laws which enable the
government to keep things secret as long as they fancy). These refer to
Echelon and also give the boundaries by which NSA operates.

Foreign Intelligence

It's safe to assume that if an organisation like the NSA is told it may do
something then it will. This can be extended to: if the NSA isn't told it
can't do something then it probably does. In its make-up, the NSA defines
"foreign intelligence" as "any government communications in the widest
sense (not only military) and all other communications which might contain
information of military, political, scientific or economic value". So,
basically, since the NSA can listen in on civilian communications, it
will.

This ties in with the final aspect of evidence - journalists and
ex-security service personnel testimonies. The report does point out
inconsistencies with the various versions of what people believe Echelon
to be but between them they make a strong case for Echelon's existence and
basic functions - it's just the fine detail in which people vary.

What most concerns the European Parliament of course is the use of Echelon
for economic reasons. Duncan Campbell has made various allegations in this
sector, tracking what he says is evidence that important information has
been picked up from European companies and relayed through the CIA,
Advocacy Center and Department of Commerce to US firms.

The report makes a point of saying Mr Campbell's claims are not evidenced;
nevertheless, after more testimony it concludes that there is a
substantial risk that that is exactly what the US is doing and strongly
advises all European companies to encrypt their emails as a matter of
course.

The ex-security personnel's testimonies are quite interesting. Apparently
while we all use Echelon as the name for the entire system, Echelon is in
fact the name of the network. The software - which searches for key words
- are called Silkworth and Sire. However a journalist says the network is
called Platform and Echelon is the software. Ah well.

Anyway, this is only a small part of the report - which can be found here:

  http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/OM-Europarl?PROG=REPORT&L=EN&PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A5-2001-0264+0+NOT+SGML+V0//EN&LEVEL=2

- but quite interesting we think you'll agree.