[wordup] DOJ releases public comments on MS deal (more)

[Adam Shand]

From: Gene Merrill <gene at personaltelco.net>

47?! Gimme a break... I submitted a nicely worded and intellegent response,
and I'm sure thousands of others did too. I thought the Tunney Act requires
a full disclosure. I can see limiting the spam and crank emails, but I
wonder how they justified publishing less than 0.1 %

Ashcroft has been critized lately for not recusing himself from the 
process because of the amount of contributions his failed run for 
governor got from M$:

  http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020215/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_antitrust_86

The best commentary is Dan Kegel's in my opinion:

   http://www.kegel.com/remedy/letter.html

And Jeremy White (CEO of Codeweavers, think WINE project) had great
commentary too that wasn't included:

   http://www.codeweavers.com/~jwhite/tunney.html

--
gene