[wordup] Amateur News Gatherers on Public Access TV Have Same Rights as Professionals

Adam Shand adams at pixelworks.com
Wed Mar 13 16:44:48 EST 2002


Interesting precedent from the growing Peer to Peer Journalism point of
view.

Via: p2pj at infoanarchy.org
From: http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA1LU5FHYC.html

Judge Says Amateur News Gatherers on Public Access TV Have Same Rights as Professionals
By Justin Pope Associated Press Writer
Mar 6, 2002

BOSTON (AP) - A federal court has ruled that nonprofessional news
gatherers have the same rights as professionals, supporting a community
gadfly who claimed she was muzzled by a public access cable company.

It is the first ruling of its kind, said the American Civil Liberties
Union, which represented plaintiff Patricia Demarest in her fight with
Athol/Orange Community Television.

"It will open so many more doors for common citizens to use public
access as a public forum and a place to speak their minds," said
Demarest, co-producer of the program "Think Tank 2000."

"It's a fight for any common citizen to bring forth ideas and generate
healthy communities."

Demarest used the program to accuse local officials in the central
Massachusetts town of Athol of conflicts of interest.

But after she broadcast the grilling she gave one official, she was
suspended by the cable company, whose board is appointed by the city.
The company also changed its rules to ban controversial programming,
requiring broadcasters to get written permission from anyone they
portrayed.

Last week, however, U.S. District Judge Michael Ponsor in Springfield
ruled that such shows constitute a "public forum" and have First
Amendment protection.

AOTV lawyer Peter Epstein said he had not read the verdict and could not
comment.

The cable company said after several controversial broadcasts in 2000
that the regulation requiring written consent was necessary to prevent
unfair coverage.

The ACLU argued that would prevent coverage of any public official.

Cable access provides the same opportunity to share ideas as printed
leaflets and soap boxes did in the past, said Bill Newman, director of
the western Massachusetts chapter of the ACLU.

"Citizen producers of shows are entitled to the same First Amendment
protections as producers of shows for large media outlets," Newman said.

The judge essentially agreed, writing that the requirement "made news
makers news editors. By refusing to sign a release form, Athol's news
makers could ensure that their images did not appear on AOTV."

Ponsor also struck down an AOTV rule that prohibits broadcasters from
showing illegal acts. Such a requirement, he said, would have prevented
the broadcast of "some of the most important moments in American
history," including footage of the Bloody Sunday attack on civil rights
marchers in Selma, Ala.






More information about the wordup mailing list